Dec 1, 2008
Nanopositioning: how to make the right choices
The range of nanopositioning solutions on the market is broader than ever before as applications continue to drive the technology. Stefan Vorndran of PI outlines the options.
For many of today’s optical applications, traditional positioning systems based on ballscrew drives or electromagnetic linear motors are not the answer. As new applications continue to demand faster and more precise motion control systems, manufacturers have had to dig deeper than ever before to keep pace.
Until recently, piezoelectric-based positioners offered sub-nanometre precision but only over very short motion ranges. Now, progress in piezo ceramic actuator and motor design, as well as control technologies, has solved this conundrum and users have a wide selection of piezo actuator devices to choose from. This article looks at the applications that have driven the development and the variety of piezo technology that is on the market.
Semiconductor applications that use e-beam lithography and scanning electron microscopes have driven the development of fieldless and compact piezo devices that can be positioned anywhere inside a machine without causing negative effects. Recently, the medical market has started to adopt piezo systems and is benefiting from years of refinement in other industries.
For medical imaging applications, such as magnetic resonance imaging, 3D optical microscopy or optical coherence tomography (see figure 1 above), piezo drives offer substantial advantages due to their high efficiency, direct-acting linear motion, high resolution, fast response and non-magnetic characteristics.
In drug discovery, a multitude of samples has to be examined in the shortest possible time. Techniques such as fluorescence imaging are employed and require precise focusing on small amounts of liquid, usually held in multiwell plates (see figure 2).
For long-range, well-to-well positioning, conventional electric motors or voice-coil drives can typically provide the required speed and precision but the focusing is best achieved with frictionless, piezo flexure stages or objective positioners. Response times on the order of a few milliseconds allow extremely fast focusing and rapid data acquisition. The fast response also reduces the risk of photobleaching caused by long-term exposure.
Near-field scanning microscopy has similar speed/resolution requirements. Here, small samples are scanned, typically 100 × 100 µm to 500 × 500 µm, with nanometre lateral resolution. To minimize the scanning time and achieve the high resolution required, flexure-guided piezo stages are the only option. The latest designs employ a parallel-kinematic motion principle, with all actuators acting on one moving central platform, greatly reducing inertia for much improved dynamics. Integrated capacitive sensors take multi-axis measurements against a common fixed reference (parallel metrology). This approach allows drift-free positioning with nanometre straightness, which is not available with classical stacked or nested multi-axis designs. The same approach yields superior surface metrology results in atomic force microscopes.
In many of today’s industrial production and testing processes, dynamics and throughput are paramount. In disk-drive head/media metrology applications for example, sub-nanometre steps need to be executed and settled to nanometre tolerances in a matter of milliseconds. But in order to test an entire disk, travel ranges in the centimetre range are needed.
Until recently, these were mutually exclusive requirements, but today new controller technologies make hybrid nanopositioning systems a reality (see figure 3). These systems combine the advantages of servo-motor/ballscrews (long travel range, high holding force) with piezo-stage technology (frictionless flexure guides, unlimited resolution, fast and crisp response).
Many optical alignment applications in astronomy would benefit from actuators that simultaneously provide millimetres of backlash-free travel at nanometre resolution and can hold a position against large forces without drift and heat dissipation over long periods of time. These dual requirements were impossible to meet until a robust piezo motor based on the PiezoWalk linear actuator principle became available.
The PiezoWalk principle combines lateral and longitudinal actuation of piezo elements that are preloaded in arrays about a central ceramic runner. A digital controller sequences their operation, providing high force, long travel step-mode actuation plus picometre precision high-bandwidth actuation.
As with all piezo motors, PiezoWalk drives are inherently vacuum-compatible and fieldless, with force generation to 600 N and nanoscale power-off position stability. When arranged in a parallel kinematic hexapod design, they can provide motion in six degrees of freedom (see figure 4).
The hexapod approach with its virtual pivot point and available large central aperture is suitable for optical alignment problems as large as secondary mirrors in the latest generation of astronomical telescopes and as small as fibre-to-photonic-component-alignment in telecommunication chip production.
Another use of piezo ceramics technology is in ultrasonic piezo motors. These are composed of monolithic piezo ceramic slabs electrically stimulated to drive standing waves in the substrate at high frequencies. The latest ultrasonic linear motor implementations come in sizes as small as 8 mm, achieve velocities to 800 mm/s and can provide unlimited travel ranges while maintaining submicron resolution.
Piezo ceramic motion systems have long been the number one choice for ultrahigh precision motion. With the ever-increasing requirements from the optics, biotechnology and semiconductor industries, manufacturers were forced to find ways to overcome limitations such as travel range and linearity while preserving their unmatched speed, acceleration and resolution capabilities.
With the abundance of choices available today, it is more important than ever for the vendor to understand the user’s application and its requirements on dynamics and precision as well as the control and interfacing preferences of the customer. If the user is willing to do a little homework and engage in a dialogue with a credible manufacturer, the result will be a significant step forward from what was feasible just a few years ago.
• This article first appeared on our sister website, optics.org
About the author
Stefan Vorndran is director of corporate product marketing and communications at PI (Physik Instrumente). For more information, see www.pi.ws or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.